CoturnvsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 19 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Coturn scores 71/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Coturn.
Coturn is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).
Coturn details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with