multicavsR2R
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multica | R2R | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 124 in AI | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 54 221 | 8 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 913 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 913 stars in 30 days).
multica details →R2R details →
Swap a project
Keep multica, compare it with
Keep R2R, compare it with