openclawvsR2R
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | R2R | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 393 300 | 8 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 952 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 952 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →R2R details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep R2R, compare it with