multicavsPulse
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multica | Pulse | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 54 125 | 6 973 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 883 | +232 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 | 43 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 43 for Pulse.
If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; multica needs more configuration.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 883 stars in 30 days).
multica details →Pulse details →
Swap a project
Keep multica, compare it with
Keep Pulse, compare it with