MTranServervsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MTranServer | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Translation | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 4 731 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 63/100 for MTranServer, so it is the safer default.
MTranServer ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, MTranServer is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).
MTranServer details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep MTranServer, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with