MQTTX WebvsNodeBB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MQTTX Web | NodeBB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #4 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 15 243 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 30 |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v4.16.4 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
NodeBB scores 73/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
NodeBB ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; NodeBB needs more configuration.
MQTTX Web details →NodeBB details →
Swap a project
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with
Keep NodeBB, compare it with