motionEyevsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| motionEye | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
motionEye scores 65/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.
If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
motionEye details →Windows ARM details →