motionEyevsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| motionEye | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
motionEye scores 65/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.
If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.
motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
motionEye details →UUSEC WAF details →