UUSEC WAFvsViseron
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| UUSEC WAF | Viseron | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #2 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 3 669 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +121 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 | v3.7.0 · 17 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Viseron scores 70/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
Viseron ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
Viseron is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).
UUSEC WAF details →Viseron details →