motionEyevsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| motionEye | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
motionEye scores 65/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
motionEye details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →