monoscopevsRustrak
Two self-hosted Sentry alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| monoscope | Rustrak | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #40 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #4 of 5 in Error Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 2 008 | 808 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +176 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.6.31 · 10 Oct 2026 | v0.21.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Haskell | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
monoscope scores 60/100 against 55/100 for Rustrak, so it is the safer default.
monoscope ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Rustrak.
If you want the quickest setup, Rustrak is easier to run; monoscope needs more configuration.
monoscope is growing faster right now (+176 stars in 30 days).
monoscope details →Rustrak details → All Sentry alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep monoscope, compare it with
Keep Rustrak, compare it with