monockervsZabbix
Two self-hosted Monitoring & observability projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| monocker | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #70 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 6 519 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 47/100 for monocker, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, monocker is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
monocker details →Zabbix details →All Monitoring & observability projects →
Swap a project
Keep monocker, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with