monockervssignoz
Two self-hosted Monitoring & observability projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| monocker | signoz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #70 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #7 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 32 475 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +300 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 38 |
| Latest release | — | v0.148.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
signoz scores 79/100 against 47/100 for monocker, so it is the safer default.
signoz ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for monocker.
If you want the quickest setup, monocker is easier to run; signoz needs more configuration.
signoz is growing faster right now (+300 stars in 30 days).
monocker details →signoz details →All Monitoring & observability projects →
Swap a project
Keep monocker, compare it with
Keep signoz, compare it with