monockervsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| monocker | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #70 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 47/100 for monocker, so it is the safer default.
monocker details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep monocker, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with