monitorss-botvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| monitorss-bot | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in RSS | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 1 296 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 76 |
| Latest release | v7.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 58/100 for monitorss-bot, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for monitorss-bot.
If you want the quickest setup, ToolJet is easier to run; monitorss-bot needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
monitorss-bot details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep monitorss-bot, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with