Moltisvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Moltis | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 928 | 93 060 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 | +1 266 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 19 |
| Latest release | 20261023.01 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 62/100 for Moltis, so it is the safer default.
Moltis ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Moltis needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 266 stars in 30 days).
Moltis details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Moltis, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with