mkcertWebvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mkcertWeb | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Certificate Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 221 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 7 |
| Latest release | v4.4.2 · 15 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 48/100 for mkcertWeb, so it is the safer default.
mkcertWeb ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; mkcertWeb needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
mkcertWeb details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep mkcertWeb, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with