mkcertWebvssentry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mkcertWeb | sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Certificate Management | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 221 | 45 678 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +839 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 22 |
| Latest release | v4.4.2 · 15 Oct 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sentry scores 80/100 against 48/100 for mkcertWeb, so it is the safer default.
sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for mkcertWeb.
If you want the quickest setup, mkcertWeb is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
sentry is growing faster right now (+839 stars in 30 days).
mkcertWeb details →sentry details →
Swap a project
Keep mkcertWeb, compare it with
Keep sentry, compare it with