mkcertWebvsOpenList
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mkcertWeb | OpenList | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Certificate Management | #2 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 221 | 25 326 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +568 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 15 |
| Latest release | v4.4.2 · 15 Oct 2026 | v4.2.9 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OpenList scores 80/100 against 48/100 for mkcertWeb, so it is the safer default.
OpenList ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for mkcertWeb.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenList is easier to run; mkcertWeb needs more configuration.
OpenList is growing faster right now (+568 stars in 30 days).
mkcertWeb details →OpenList details →
Swap a project
Keep mkcertWeb, compare it with
Keep OpenList, compare it with