Mix Studiovsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mix Studio | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 11 in Image Generation | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 302 | 393 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 952 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 37 |
| Latest release | v1.3.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 50/100 for Mix Studio, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Mix Studio.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; Mix Studio needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 952 stars in 30 days).
Mix Studio details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep Mix Studio, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with