mitmproxyvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mitmproxy | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 46 451 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 316 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 4 |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 316 stars in 30 days).
mitmproxy details →WBO details →