minisatipvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| minisatip | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #33 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 373 | 61 541 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +497 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.0.179 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 52/100 for minisatip, so it is the safer default.
minisatip ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; minisatip needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).
minisatip details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep minisatip, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with