copypartyvsminisatip
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | minisatip | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #33 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 | 373 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.0.179 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 52/100 for minisatip, so it is the safer default.
minisatip ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; minisatip needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →minisatip details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep minisatip, compare it with