minisatipvsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| minisatip | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #33 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 373 | 28 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +464 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.0.179 · 27 Oct 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | C++ | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 52/100 for minisatip, so it is the safer default.
minisatip ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenWrt.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; minisatip needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).
minisatip details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep minisatip, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with