minisatipvsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| minisatip | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #33 of 54 in Media Streaming | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 373 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.0.179 · 27 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader scores 59/100 against 52/100 for minisatip, so it is the safer default.
minisatip ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for OpenReader.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; minisatip needs more configuration.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
minisatip details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep minisatip, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with