Mikochivstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mikochi | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 378 | 24 044 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +784 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.12.2 · 15 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 50/100 for Mikochi, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Mikochi is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+784 stars in 30 days).
Mikochi details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Mikochi, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with