midgardvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| midgard | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 15 in Productivity | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 230 | 45 007 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 634 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 34 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 27 Sept 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 48/100 for midgard, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for midgard.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; midgard needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 634 stars in 30 days).
midgard details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep midgard, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with