microclawvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| microclaw | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 120 in AI Assistant | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 749 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.11.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 52/100 for microclaw, so it is the safer default.
microclaw ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; microclaw needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
microclaw details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep microclaw, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with