microclawvssglang
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| microclaw | sglang | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 120 in AI Assistant | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 749 | 38 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 917 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 17 |
| Latest release | v0.11.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sglang scores 86/100 against 52/100 for microclaw, so it is the safer default.
microclaw ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for sglang.
If you want the quickest setup, microclaw is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
sglang is growing faster right now (+1 917 stars in 30 days).
microclaw details →sglang details →
Swap a project
Keep microclaw, compare it with
Keep sglang, compare it with