metamcpvssglang
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| metamcp | sglang | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 2 735 | 38 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +1 920 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sglang scores 86/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.
sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.
If you want the quickest setup, metamcp is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
sglang is growing faster right now (+1 920 stars in 30 days).
metamcp details →sglang details →
Swap a project
Keep metamcp, compare it with
Keep sglang, compare it with