metamcpvsOmniRoute
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| metamcp | OmniRoute | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 2 734 | 82 212 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +3 196 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.
OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; metamcp needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 196 stars in 30 days).
metamcp details →OmniRoute details →
Swap a project
Keep metamcp, compare it with
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with