metamcpvsRabbitMQ
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| metamcp | RabbitMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 2 734 | 13 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 14 |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.
metamcp details →RabbitMQ details →
Swap a project
Keep metamcp, compare it with
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with