metamcpvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| metamcp | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 2 735 | 393 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +2 876 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 37 |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 876 stars in 30 days).
metamcp details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep metamcp, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with