metamcpvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| metamcp | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 2 735 | 93 190 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +57 916 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 35 |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 916 stars in 30 days).
metamcp details →OmniVoice-Studio details →
Swap a project
Keep metamcp, compare it with
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with