metamcpvsOctoBot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| metamcp | OctoBot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 2 734 | 6 873 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +266 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OctoBot scores 69/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.
OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.
OctoBot is growing faster right now (+266 stars in 30 days).
metamcp details →OctoBot details →
Swap a project
Keep metamcp, compare it with
Keep OctoBot, compare it with