Metabasevswerbot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | werbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 36/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #36 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 49 927 | 169 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +515 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Clojure | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 36/100 for werbot, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for werbot.
If you want the quickest setup, Metabase is easier to run; werbot needs more configuration.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+515 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →werbot details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep werbot, compare it with