MetabasevsWazuh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | Wazuh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 49 904 | 17 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +506 | +493 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Clojure | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 80/100 for Wazuh, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.
If you want the quickest setup, Metabase is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.
Metabase details →Wazuh details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep Wazuh, compare it with