MetabasevsVigil365
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | Vigil365 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 49 956 | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +544 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | C# |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.
If you want the quickest setup, Metabase is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+544 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →Vigil365 details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep Vigil365, compare it with