MeshCentralvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MeshCentral | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 23 in Remote Access | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 7 531 | 95 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +253 | +2 339 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 25 |
| Latest release | 1.3.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 74/100 for MeshCentral, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for MeshCentral.
If you want the quickest setup, MeshCentral is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).
MeshCentral details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep MeshCentral, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with