MedusaJsvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 36 989 | 89 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +538 | +2 393 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 83/100 for MedusaJs, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 393 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with