MedusaJsvsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 36 990 | 53 720 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +539 | +325 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs and WindowsinDocker score the same (83/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for WindowsinDocker.
If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs details →WindowsinDocker details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep WindowsinDocker, compare it with