MedusaJsvsunopim
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | unopim | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 36 987 | 11 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +547 | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for unopim.
If you want the quickest setup, unopim is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+547 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →unopim details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep unopim, compare it with