MedusaJsvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 36 993 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +542 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 76 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 77/100 for ToolJet, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MedusaJs.
If you want the quickest setup, ToolJet is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+542 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with