MedusaJsvsquackback
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | quackback | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 36 988 | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +548 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for quackback.
If you want the quickest setup, quackback is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+548 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →quackback details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep quackback, compare it with