MedusaJsvsProject N.O.M.A.D.
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | Project N.O.M.A.D. | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 36 989 | 41 170 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +538 | +2 819 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 83/100 for MedusaJs, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Project N.O.M.A.D..
If you want the quickest setup, Project N.O.M.A.D. is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 819 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →Project N.O.M.A.D. details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with