MedusaJsvsprivate-gpt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | private-gpt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 7 in LLM Integration |
| GitHub stars | 36 988 | 57 613 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +537 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.0.1 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 81/100 for private-gpt, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for private-gpt.
If you want the quickest setup, private-gpt is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+537 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →private-gpt details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep private-gpt, compare it with