Mediariumvstubesync
Two self-hosted Sonarr alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mediarium | tubesync | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #60 of 142 in Media Management | #24 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 271 | 2 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.8.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.18.5 · 8 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
tubesync scores 60/100 against 52/100 for Mediarium, so it is the safer default.
tubesync ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Mediarium.
If you want the quickest setup, tubesync is easier to run; Mediarium needs more configuration.
tubesync is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).
Mediarium details →tubesync details → All Sonarr alternatives →