MediaMTXvsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 18 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with