MediaMTXvsSyncWatch同步观影
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | SyncWatch同步观影 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 20 537 | 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +301 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; SyncWatch同步观影 needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →SyncWatch同步观影 details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep SyncWatch同步观影, compare it with