MediaMTXvsSOLECTRUS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | SOLECTRUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #20 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 20 544 | 166 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +292 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.3.4 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 51/100 for SOLECTRUS, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SOLECTRUS.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; SOLECTRUS needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+292 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →SOLECTRUS details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep SOLECTRUS, compare it with